Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On February 2, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment by the Seoul Central District Court due to the crime of interference with business, etc., and completed the execution of the sentence in the original prison on August 13, 2017.

On June 1, 2018, at around 23:00, the Defendant interfered with the victim's convenience store business by force over about 30 minutes by avoiding disturbance, such as taking a bath to customers with a large amount of noise and leaving an empty bet disease on the ground, on the ground that the strong infant located next to the victim D'E convenience store operated by the victim D in Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. A statement of victim of the F;

1. Application of investigation reports (verification of suspect's previous convictions and date of release), judgment rendered by Seoul Central District Court 2016 High Court Decision 2016 High Court Decision 8176, and the current status of personal

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines concerning the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The assertion;

A. The Defendant, at around 23:00 on June 1, 2018, did not wish to customers with a large sound, and there was no desire to do so, and the strong will of a woman being fright to fright to fright to fright and fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright

B. The Defendant, at around 23:45 on June 1, 2018, cannot be said to have interfered with the Defendant’s business of convenience stores by force, even though the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol and was displayed in front of the Kabter at the place where the body cannot be accumulated.

2. Determination

A. On the first assertion of the crime of interference with business, the term “compact” in the crime of interference with business is all the forces capable of suppressing and mixing a free will of people, and is either tangible or intangible.