Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 13, 2015, at around 14:10, the Defendant interfered with the business, without any justifiable reason, expressed the victim D (27 years of age) and victim E (26 years of age) who had been exercising a promotional event by setting aside a pair of vehicles in front of the “C” located in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s automobile sales promotion business by force by force by force of customers who want to receive counseling on the vehicle sales promotion business by avoiding disturbance due to the occurrence of the victim D.

2. The obstruction of performance of official duties, insult, the Defendant: (a) asked G to return home from the slope victim G of the Seoul Sungdong Police Station Fast, which was called “Fastch faat faat faat faat faat faat faat faat faat faat faat faat faat faat faat faat faat faat faat faat faat faat faat faat faat faat faat faat faat faat faat faat faat faat f faat faat faat faat faat faat faat fa

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reporting duties, and openly insultd the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to G and E;

1. Article 314 (1), Article 136 (1), and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. The reason behind the sentencing of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act is contrary to the punishment, the victim E does not want the punishment of the defendant, and the degree of assaulting obstruction of performance of official duties is very minor.