A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

On May 13, 2008, the Defendant issued, at the Seoul Central District Court, a summary order of KRW 2,50,000,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act; on October 30, 2009, a summary order of KRW 4 million as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, etc.; on July 4, 2014, a summary order of KRW 8 million as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (a quasi-driving) was issued from the Suwon Flag Flag Flag to the Suwon Flag Flag Flag, and on June 12, 202, a summary order of KRW 18 million as a fine for the same crime, respectively, from the Suwon Flag Flag Flag to the same crime.

1. On August 25, 2020, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) driving a Do Hybrid car without the driver’s license from around 4km to the pay parking lot located in the Gu in the Gu from the front road of the B apartment at the king-si, Gyeonggi-si, to the Goyang-si, Goyang-si.

2. Violation of the Traffic Act (Refusal of measurement of drinking), Defendant 1 was driven under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking, drinking, snicking, snicking, snicking, drinking, drinking, drinking, and drinking at a fee parking hold in the Gu C during the period of the time indicated in the above 1. Paragraph 1. at the time of the arrival of the 112 notice that the driving of drinking is doubtful, and during the safe period of the entrance of the police station, Defendant 1 was under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking, drinking, drinking, drinking, drinking, and drinking, drinking at the outlet of drinking.

There is a reasonable reason to recognize it, and it was demanded to respond to the alcohol measurement by inserting the breathm in three times between about 20 minutes.

Nevertheless, the defendant was driving by an acting engineer.

The police officer did not comply with a police officer's demand for alcohol testing without justifiable grounds by explicitly refusing measurement.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the prohibition of drinking under the Road Traffic Act more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Report on the circumstances of driving at home, report on the circumstances of the driver at home, and report on the results of regulating drinking;

1. The driver's license ledger;

1. Investigation report (report on the situation of the driver in charge); and

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Criminal history;