logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2018.02.20 2017고단789
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2017 Highest 789]

1. No defendant who violates the Narcotics Control Act shall possess, possess, use, transport, control, import, export, manufacture, prepare, administer, administer, deliver, trade, assist in the trade of, or provide narcotics or psychotropic drugs, because he/she is not a person handling narcotics;

A. On September 4, 2017, the Defendant, at around 21:00, delivered one disposable injection device containing approximately 0.06 g of Melopon (hereinafter “philopon”) to G, which is a local mental medicine in front of the inn of “E” located in Seocheon-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do (hereinafter “former F”), and received it.

B. On October 31, 2017, the Defendant committed the crime of possession of phiphonephones: (a) was placed in a manner that puts up the sum of philophones, which were divided into two in the honed paper of vinyl, in front of Boli-si, Boli-si, H in the middle of Boli-si, in a manner that puts up approximately 0.59g of plasticphones into wallets.

[2018 Height 10]

2. On January 14, 2014, the Defendant obstructed the exercise of the right to collateral security against the said vehicle’s name on the 16th day of the same month, taking out a loan of KRW 36,000,000 from Hyundai Capital Co., Ltd., by purchasing JIstren vehicles at the International Agency located in Jeonju-si.

Although the Defendant decided to repay the loan over a 60-month period, on February 25, 2015, the Defendant lost the benefit of time due to the failure to pay the installment, and the Defendant requested the Defendant to return the vehicle several times from May 2016 to September 12, 2017, even though the Defendant refused to return the vehicle and concealed the vehicle by making it impossible to identify the location of the vehicle.

In this respect, the defendant concealed goods that were the object of the victim company's rights and obstructed the exercise of rights by the victim company.

Summary of Evidence

[2017 Highest 789]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The police in relation to G.

arrow