logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2015.05.14 2014고단2042
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Part of the facts charged shall be revised and supplemented without going through amendments to indictment to the extent that it seems that there is no concern about substantial disadvantage to the defendant's defense right.

1. At around 03:40 on December 6, 2014, the injured Defendant demanded contact from the victim E (n, 26 years of age) and the victim F (n, 25 years of age) in the D cafeteria located in the Mayang-gu Man-si, Annyang-si, Annyang-si, the Defendant continued to take care of the victims as the victims were refused, and the victims were able to take care of the victims as the victims, and the victims were able to take care of the victims E, and the victims were able to take care of the victims E, and the victims were able to take care of the victims’ shoulder on several occasions by putting the heads of the women over the floor, and continued to put them back to the floor by putting them down with both hands.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim E, such as cages of the bones of trees, which require approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and cages of cage cages, etc. which require approximately two weeks of medical treatment to the victim F, respectively.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and time as mentioned in the preceding paragraph, committed assault by a police officer belonging to the G District in the Gyeonggianan Police Station G District and I, who received 112 reports and sought to hear the statements of the victims of the instant injury, while the Defendant’s daily behavior J expressed the said police officer’s desire against the said police officer and arrested him as a flagrant offender, on the ground that “I am out of humf why he would walth, ma, and escape.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning H 112 reporting handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of the I, H, and EF;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to F and E of each medical certificate;

1. Relevant Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Aggravation for concurrent crimes;

arrow