beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3 million, respectively.
The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On October 21, 2016, at around 23:35, the Defendants asserted with the victims for disregarding the victim F and the victim G's children in front of the E convenience store in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City D Building on the ground that they did not answer even though the victim F and the victim's children have reached their own children, Defendant A had the left part of the above G with drinking, flicking the flat with the upper part of the above G, and flicking the flat with the two hand, blicking the shoulder of the above G, blicking the shoulder of the above G, making the flat with the upper part of the victim's H, and flicking the flat with the upper part of the flat, making the flat with the upper part of the flat, making the flat with the upper part of the flat with the upper part of the flat, and the above flat with the upper part of the h.
As a result, the Defendants jointly committed an assault against the said G on the f and the said F and the said H, both of which require treatment for about 15 days.
Summary of Evidence
1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Each legal statement of witness F, G, H and I;
1. A damaged photograph (G), on-site photograph, and damaged photograph;
1. In addition to the investigation report (victim G diagnosis report, etc.) [Attachment] (the Defendants and the defense counsel argued that Defendant A has made a relatively detailed and detailed statement from the investigation agency to the investigation agency on the following circumstances, namely, the victims and I have a consistent statement, and the situation explanation is reasonable in light of the empirical rule, in light of the fact that Defendant A has taken the left eye of G on drinking, the F’s shoulder was not tightly damaged, and the F’s shoulder was merely an act at the defensive level, and that Defendant B did not take part in and do not use violence. However, the following circumstances acknowledged in accordance with the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court.