1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the Defendants shall be revoked, and the Plaintiffs corresponding to the revoked part shall be the Defendants.

Basic Facts

The parties concerned Plaintiff B is a person who was pregnant of a pair of children on October 2010 and was examined by the H Hospital located in Young-gu G in Suwon-gu (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”), and Plaintiff A is the husband of Plaintiff B, and Plaintiff C is the child between Plaintiff A and B.

The Defendants, including I, are those who employ the medical professionals of the Defendant Hospital and jointly operate the Defendant Hospital, and I is the doctor of the department who mainly took charge of the Plaintiff B’s diagnosis of the mountain field as a father and a medical specialist belonging to the Defendant Hospital, and J and K are those who were employed by the Defendant Hospital and worked in the Defendant Hospital on May 31, 201 while working in the Defendant Hospital as a father and a medical specialist.

Plaintiff

B’s completion of the medical examination at the Defendant Hospital and the Plaintiff B’s death at the deceased Party B, on October 27, 2010, caused a positive reaction in the pregnancy reaction test using a pregnancy test device (u-hcg test on September 23, 2010), which was conducted at the Defendant Hospital on September 30, 201, and had not been confirmed at the time of the medical examination and treatment, and was diagnosed by a doctor and a medical specialist belonging to the Defendant Hospital on November 12, 2010.

Plaintiff

B means around November 24, 2010 (eight (eight (eight (eight (eight) week in pregnancy) that the Defendant Hospital applied to I for a so-called her so-called her blood transfusion on the same day, and I is accompanied by the Plaintiff B’s symptoms before 20 weeks in abortion.

This is distinguished from the documentary heritage, complete or incomplete heritage, etc. in that it is possible to maintain pregnancy.

The diagnosis was conducted.

Since then, on December 29, 2010, the plaintiff B was born to the defendant hospital on the 13th anniversary of pregnancy, and was diagnosed by the I as a pair of pregnancy.

Since then, Plaintiff B is pregnant 29th day of April 20, 201, and thereafter, Plaintiff B is transferred from I to I on a regular basis at Defendant Hospital by one month until April 20, 201 (see January 25, 2011; February 23, 2011; March 23, 2011; April 20, 201), and two weeks thereafter (see May 4, 201; May 18, 201).