Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years and for six months, respectively.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a public official who is in charge of the duties, such as personnel affairs, uniforms, benefits, welfare, conclusion of a contract for goods, execution of budget, construction and maintenance of facilities, and maintenance and repair of the F University’s employees, while working as the chief of the F University’s general affairs division (Grade V) from May 11, 201 to December 31, 2013. Defendant B supplied the F University with various clothes and miscellaneous articles, such as clothes, verbal expressions, etc., by the trade name “H” and “I,” and Defendant B supplied the F University with uniforms and miscellaneous articles, such as clothes, verbal expressions, etc.

1. Defendant A

A. On August 13, 2011, the Defendant received a bribe from J in relation to his duties, upon receiving a request to convert 10 million won in cash, from J as an employee of an inorganic contract who was employed by J as F University Fixed-term Contract Officer from H on August 23, 201, and then received a bribe in relation to his duties.

2) On September 1, 2012, around 14:00, the Defendant received a bribe in relation to duties in cash upon receiving a request for employment of five million won as a technician in a case where a vacancy occurs after the Defendant hired H H H’s H’s subordinate K as a contracting staff at F University’s fixed-term contracting staff at F University.

B. B around April 16, 2012, around 20:00, the Defendant received a bribe in relation to his duties by receiving KRW 9.7 million under the pretext of having the Defendant enter into a contract for the number of delivery of goods, and having the Defendant receive a bribe in relation to his duties, under the pretext of having the Defendant receive a bribe in order to promptly receive the payment of goods, such as verbal, check, and living clothes, which were supplied from the H to the F University from the H.

2) On April 2013, the Defendant received a bribe in relation to duties by receiving cash of KRW 10 million under the pretext of having the Defendant enter into a contract for the delivery of goods, such as verbal, check, and life clothes, which were supplied from H to F University from H, and having the Defendant receive a bribe in relation to his duties, under the pretext of having the Defendant enter into a contract for the delivery of goods.

2. Defendant B

A. On April 16, 2012, the Defendant supplied F University A from the above “H” around 20:00 to F University.