Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 100.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 29, 2015, Defendant A, at around the F coffee specialty store located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on August 29, 2015, deemed that, upon receiving the report of 112, H and I, a police officer affiliated with the Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Police Station G police box, Defendant A, who is a police officer assigned to the Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Police Station G police station, would drive a patrol vehicle and arrive at the scene.

Accordingly, the Defendant: (a) examined the part of the patrol car as his hand; (b) obstructed the course of the patrol car by putting him on the side of the driver’s seat; (c) obstructed the process of the patrol car; and (d) sought to verify the reported contents by the above H, etc. and the reasons for the above act, the Defendant, who was the Defendant, escaped to the alley, along with the Defendant’s act of causing damage to him; and (d) avoided this from the above H, she saw the Defendant, “I am the frighter, frighter, frighter, frighter, frighter, frighter, frighter, frighter, frighter, frighter, frighter, frighter, frighter, and frighted the Defendant’s shoulder and frighter, which this I tried to arrest the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers related to criminal investigation.

2. Defendants B and C arrested them as flagrant offenders who interfered with the performance of official duties at the same time and place, and arrested them as flagrant offenders and arrested them to go to the patrol vehicle, prevented them from carrying the said I arms in front of the patrol vehicle to stop them, prevented them from getting off, let the police officers get off them to go to the patrol vehicle, let them return them to the patrol vehicle, and Defendant C committed assault, such as threatening the above H.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers on criminal investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to I and H;

1. Written statements of the J;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Defendant A of the pertinent Article of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime: Defendants B and C of Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act.