logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.07.11 2017고단1475
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are friendly relatives.

1. On December 31, 2016, the Defendants jointly committed the crimes of the Defendants: (a) around 01:30 on December 31, 2016, on the street prior to the front door of the Gyeonggi Gyeonggi-do Police Station in the digital field to pay taxi fares; and (b) during that process, the Defendants were sent to the scene, E and F, a police officer belonging to the D District Unit of the Gyeonggi Mine Police Station, upon receiving a 112 report from a taxi engineer.

During that, the Defendants did not satisfly handle civil petitions related to taxi charges of the above police officers on the patrol vehicle and obstructed the front of the patrol vehicle, and Defendant A was unable to sat down the patrol vehicle after the satisfing the front of the patrol vehicle. Defendant A was able to have the front of the patrol vehicle, 4 times the front of the driver’s seat in drinking, 4 times the front of the driver’s seat in drinking, 4 times the driver’s seat in driving, and Defendant B took part in it and took part in it on a bridge with a view to obstructing the movement of the patrol vehicle and obstructing the movement of the patrol vehicle.

As a result, the Defendants jointly interfered with the duties of the above police officers such as the maintenance of legitimate security order.

2. On December 31, 2016, Defendant A filed a civil petition with regard to the handling of the instant reporting case at the G Gambling-gu Police Station G Gambling-gu, Gambling-gu, 2016, Defendant A brought a loss on the chest part of the above police officer F ( female) and received the foregoing police officer’s control, despite the receipt of the foregoing police officer’s instructions, the said police officer’s her hand-to-face, and again used the said police officer on several occasions, such as “ how her hand-to-face, her head is, and how her head is in face-to-face, and how her hand-face.” While the said police officer was aground, her hand-on on the chest part of the chest, the said police officer was boomed with the chest part and her clothes of the said police officer, and she was frightd.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the duty of the police officer, such as the maintenance of legitimate public order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1.Each.

arrow