logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2015.12.24 2015고단1942
공무집행방해
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the Defendants did not pay the fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 8, 2015, at the office of "D," located in Daegu-gu Office, Seogu, Daegu-gu, and at around 22:20 on August 8, 2015, the Defendant: (a) there is a defect in issuing a notice to a person who was in the above office due to a disturbance in neighboring areas under the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act; and (b) there is a defect in the police officer to issue a notice to a person who was in the above office; (b) if the police officer raises and raises and reports, and if the reporter is informed of the reporter, he did not so.” The Defendant expressed that “Seak-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Police Station E District, and Police Officers called “Seak-gu,” and “Seak-gu,” and snacking expenses that contain food on several occasions by having the above police officers take a flue, and thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties, such as the maintenance of public order and security of the police officer.

2. Defendant B: (a) at the date and time and place indicated in paragraph (1) of this Article, the police officer F, in order to arrest A as a flagrant offender of the obstruction of performance of official duties; (b) prevented the police officer F from arresting F’s arms by blocking the police officer F’s arms; (c) left the police officer G with the defect that the police officer G’s attempt to arrest A, and continued to arrest A, thereby preventing the police officer from opening the door of the patrol vehicle when the police officer arrested A and takes aboard the patrol vehicle; and (d) obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties in relation to the maintenance of public security and criminal investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. - A copy of the work site;

1. Application of two-way on-site photographs;

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Commercial concurrent defendants: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants who choose to impose punishment: (a) choose to choose a fine; (b) choose a fine; and (c) appear to reflect the attitude; and (d) the degree of police officers’ damage is relatively

arrow