A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On September 20, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of suspended execution for six months of imprisonment with prison labor due to a violation of road traffic law (unlicensed driving) in the support of the Suwon Friwon, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 28, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. On June 15, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) driving on the road without obtaining a driver’s license for a motor vehicle on or around 15:10, the Defendant driven Bone Star Cornex in the section of approximately 20km away from the section of the 20km away to the road adjacent to the point of 20.2km away from the upstream line of the Seoul Metropolitan circulating Highway to the south-si.

2. A person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act is prohibited from operating a motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance, but the Defendant operated the said Lone Star Co., Ltd., which was not covered by mandatory insurance in the date, time and section specified in paragraph (1).

3. The Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) and the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter “Road Traffic Act”) and the Defendant driven the said Lone Star Co., Ltd. as set out in paragraph (1) and proceeded along one-lane between the six-lanes, one-lane, namely, the Seoul and its outer circular expressway, at the end of the Southern branch of the lower branch of the road, at the surface of the Guriside, from

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to maintain a sufficient safety distance with the motor vehicle in front, and accurately operate the steering gear and brake system of the motor vehicle and prevent the accident from being caused by the accident.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent in driving while driving the vehicle at the front of the Defendant’s vehicle, and the part of the Defendant was followed by the D Madi vehicle, which was driven by the victim C(30 years) who was parked at the front of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, inflicted injury on the victim E, who is the son of the said victim and the son of the said vehicle, respectively, for approximately two weeks of medical treatment.