A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three months.

Punishment of the crime

On November 28, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to six months in Seoul Western District Court due to a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, a violation of the Road Traffic Act, a violation of the Road Traffic Act, a violation of the Road Traffic Act, a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and a violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving). The judgment became final and conclusive on December 6, 2014.

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the operation of Cone Star Cargo Vehicles.

On December 2, 2013, 19:56, the Defendant was driving the said Lone Star Cargo in front of the filling station D located in Spocheon-si without obtaining a driver’s license for a motor vehicle, and continued to drive the said Lone Star Cargo in the direction of the north-west from the surface of the steel base to the north-west.

Now, the center line and the center line are installed, so a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to refrain from making a U-turn beyond the center line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and went beyond the median line, and got off the part of the Victim F (hereinafter, 44 years old) which is normally proceeding on the opposite one-lane, which is driven by the G-learning Motor Vehicle driving by the Defendant, the fronter and left-hand gate of the said Lone Star Motor Vehicle driving car.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, sustained injury, such as cutting the body of the body of the fry at the first place in which approximately six weeks of medical treatment is required for the victim, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as immediately stopping the said car and providing relief to the victim, even though it damages the said car to the extent that its repair cost would be equivalent to KRW 4,770,000, such as exchanging the fryer-fyp pans.

2. Any person who operates an automobile shall buy the mandatory insurance determined by the State;

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not subscribe to mandatory insurance at the time and place mentioned in paragraph 1, but operated Lone Star Cargo Vehicles.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1.The police of F. F.