Defendant

A Imprisonment of one year, Defendant B, C, and D, six months, and Defendant E, respectively, and one year and two months, Defendant F, and G.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant B was sentenced to two years of suspended execution in March 29, 2013 on March 21, 2013 to the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, etc. in the Daejeon District Court’s Support, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on March 29, 2013, and is currently under suspended execution.

Criminal facts

1. Violation of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products and the Grain Management Act;

(a) No person who commits a crime from around October 20, 201 to December 20, 2011 (violation of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products) shall make a false indication of origin or make an indication that may cause confusion as to the origin.

Defendant

E and Defendant L, in collusion with N,O, P, and Q for the above period, purchased Chinese rice 132,780km and Korean rice 19,180km from R, etc. for the above period, and Defendant E transported the above rice to S and T-type storage in the city of Ha and the same city of Ha, Defendant L mixed with the ratio of 60% of Korean rice in P, Q and Q, and 40% of Korean rice in the city of Ha, and then returned it to Korea. N andO sold it to the intermediate retail, and Defendant E sold it to the intermediate retail company in the city of Ha with the origin indicated in a false way of transporting the above mixture from the above warehouse to the seller, and sold it during the market.

(b) No person who commits a crime from January 2, 2012 to February 23, 2012 (violation of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products and Violation of the Grain Management Act) shall make a false indication of origin, or make an indication likely to cause confusion as to the origin, and no grain processing operator or grain dealer shall make a false indication or advertisement concerning the production year, quality, etc. of grain or make an exaggerated indication or advertisement.

Defendant

E, Defendant L, Defendant F, and Defendant F in collusion with the above N, P, and Q for the above period, N purchased 307,340km of domestic rice and 132,880km of Korean rice from the above “R, etc.”, Defendant F and Defendant G transport the above rice to the T warehouse listed in the preceding paragraph, and Defendant L is at the ratio of 70% of domestic rice from P, Q, and China and 30% of domestic rice from Korea.