1. The Defendant: KRW 10 million to Plaintiff A; KRW 2 million to Plaintiff B; KRW 500,000 to Plaintiff C, D, E, and F, respectively.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition 1) Defendant Company is a corporation mainly engaged in textile processing business and textile manufacturing business, and Plaintiff A has been in charge of mechanical repair business, personnel, and manufacturing process management at Defendant Company. (2) Plaintiff A was engaged in the business of cutting, replacing, and repairing machines (e.g., dried 4) on the third floor of the Defendant Company’s building on January 14, 2013. However, a small-scale steel board, which was located far from the floor at the time, was placed on the left floor of the Defendant Company’s building.

(3) On February 1, 2013, the Plaintiff suffered from urology for about 10 years (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”) was provided with the cryptal and tragic therapy between the 4,50es on the left-hand side from Garyaryaryary department around February 1, 2013. However, around the 3th day of the same month, the left-hand side of the bridge and the luxa and the luxa were seriously affected, and the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Eluxian Government Eluxa Hospital on the left-hand side of the same month. (4) The Plaintiff received an industrial accident determination from the Korea Workers’ Compensation and Welfare Service on the ground of the instant accident (the name of the disease: 7,633, 370, 9, 746, 680, 250, 406, 406, 506, etc. of temporary layoff benefits.

5) Plaintiff B is the wife of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff C, D, E, and F are the children of Plaintiff A. [The fact that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, the entry of evidence Nos. 3 through 7, the witness H’s testimony, the result of the physical appraisal entrustment to the president of the Incheon Masan Hospital of the Human University, the result of the fact-finding by the Vice-Governor of Korea Labor Welfare Corporation, the purport of the whole pleadings, and the purport

B. Determination of the Industrial Safety and Health Act grants an employer an obligation to take safety measures necessary to prevent risks when running a business under Article 23(1) of the same Act, and the employer is a duty under the good faith principle accompanying the employment contract, so that the employee does not harm his/her life, body, and health while providing his/her labor.