1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 25,518,200 for the Plaintiff and its related KRW 5% per annum from August 11, 2017 to November 28, 2018; and (b) November 29, 2018.

1. Basic facts

(a) The defendant (former trade name: Co., Ltd.; hereinafter the same shall apply) is a company established with the purpose of housing construction project, housing site preparation project, construction project, etc., and the workplace is located in Ulsan-gu;

(hereinafter “Defendant’s workplace”). (b)

On September 10, 2015, while the Plaintiff was engaged in the sti pumps crushinging using the sti pumps in the end of the Defendant’s place of business, the Plaintiff was subject to an accident (hereinafter “instant accident”) caused by the Plaintiff, under the premise that the sti pumps with a thickness size are small in the entrance of a string machine, which would cause a small size of the string of the machine in operation without crushinging the string of the sti pumps with a large thickness size.

C. On December 22, 2016, the Plaintiff suffered injuries, such as the cutting of the left-hand leg, the left-hand leg, the escape of the left-hand leg, and the collapse, etc., due to the instant accident.

[Ground of recognition] The statement No. 2, the result of the court's commission of physical examination to Tol University Head of the Seoul Symna University, the purport of the whole argument

2. Judgment on the plaintiff's claim

A. The gist of the parties' assertion 1) The plaintiff, as an employer employed by the plaintiff, sustained the plaintiff's injury by negligence while neglecting his/her duty to manage and supervise a dangerous work site so as not to be threatened with the plaintiff's life, body, etc., so the defendant asserts that the plaintiff is liable to compensate the plaintiff for the 50,000,000 won as damages caused by the accident of this case (i.e., 13,000,000 won as subsidies (i., 27,000 won as consolation money) and damages for delay. 2) The defendant is not the defendant's employee at the time of the accident of this case but the defendant's employee at the time of the accident of this case, E, F, or the individual company operated by H (the representative director at the time of the defendant's request for the management of the plaintiff's accident from E and differently from the fact.