beta
Text
1. The Defendants jointly share 118,90,00 won for Plaintiff A, and 3,00,000,000 won for Plaintiff B, respectively, to Plaintiff C, D, and E 1,00.
Reasons
1. Basic facts [Relation] Plaintiff B is the wife of Plaintiff A, and the rest of Plaintiffs are children.
On October 1, 2008, Defendant F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter Defendant F, Defendant G Co., Ltd.) subcontracted the production of small and medium parts of the steel framed Corporation from Defendant G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter Defendant G Co., Ltd.) and the secondary processing adjacent construction work (hereinafter “instant construction work”). On November 1, 2008, the Plaintiff et al. newly employed on November 1, 2008 (hereinafter “Defendant F Co., Ltd.”) had the Plaintiff et al. do work for the production of steel structure with respect to the instant construction work within Defendant B’s factory.
[In the event of an accident, the plaintiff A used strings installed in the factory of the defendant 2 on November 17, 2008 to move a large 5 tons of h beam to a strings by using the strings installed in the factory of the defendant 2 on November 17, 2008, the plaintiff A suffered injury by cutting off the strings of the strings by cutting off the strings of the above strings away from the strings of the above strings, and then cutting off the strings of the strings less than the strings of the plaintiff's left, etc.
(hereinafter referred to as the "accident". [Damages damage caused by the accident] The plaintiff A received an all-story transplant on December 5, 2008 due to the annual installments system of the parts of the cutting caused by the accident in this case, and received on May 14, 2009 due to the spread and creativity of the parts of the cutting.
Plaintiff
A was suffering from a brupt since January 2009, after the brupt surgery, and around May 2009, after the brupt surgery continued to be conducted, and on March 8, 2010, after receiving a brupt correction surgery, A performed a non-dominated bruptal, brus, and bruptary brusing surgery, however, there was a brupt brush of the cutting to the degree that it was difficult to walk, and was diagnosed as a non-dominary bruptal and dumeral pathal pathy opinion on March 29, 2010.
Plaintiff
A has occurred with respect to NS A, which was used after the surgery, and the disinfection chemicals after the surgery.