logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.05.15 2016가단305897
손해배상(산)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 229,422,523 with respect to the Plaintiff, and the period from May 23, 2013 to May 15, 2018.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”) is a corporation established for the purpose of shipbuilding and repair business of ships, and Defendant C is an individual entrepreneur engaged in repair business of ships with the trade name of “D.”

B. Upon receiving a request from E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E”), Defendant B subcontracted the above repair work to Defendant C upon receiving a request for repair work for the malfunction in part of the Ftension felin (hereinafter “instant repair work”), and Defendant C instructed the Plaintiff, etc., who is a daily worker, to perform the above repair work.

다. 원고는 2013. 5. 23. 08:00경 동료근로자 2명과 함께 피고 B으로 가서 작업지시를 받고 작업도구를 수령한 후 남항대교 밖에 정박 중인 F에 승선하여 작업을 하게 되었는데, 같은 날 12:10경 유압잭을 이용하여 유압실린더를 분해하던 중 유압잭 위에 받쳐 놓은 해머가 튕겨져 나와 원고의 머리 부분을 충격하는 사고(이하 ‘이 사건 사고’라 한다)가 발생하였다. 라.

In the instant accident, the Plaintiff suffered injuries, such as the blood transfusion, cerebral cerebral tymosis, external cerebral cerebral tymosis, external tymosis, and complicated pulverization tymosis, etc.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 2 and 3, witness G testimony, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The plaintiff's assertion 1 of the parties concerned is the plaintiff's employer who ordered the plaintiff to perform the repair work of this case, and the defendant Eul has a relation of actual use with the plaintiff by giving specific directions and supervision as to the process and method of the repair work of this case. Thus, since the defendants failed to perform their duty of safety consideration, such as providing safety equipment or conducting safety education, which is an employee, and the accident of this case occurred, the defendants jointly do so.

arrow