logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.05.10 2013고정1169
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2013 High Court Decision 20169] On June 16, 2013, the Defendant posted a notice stating that the Defendant sold glaf, 600D Kaca in the Internet C Kaca in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon.

The victim D made a false statement to the effect that he/she would purchase goods by reporting and communicating a notice written by the Defendant, stating that "on the transfer of money of KRW 500,000,000, he/she will send it to the door-to-door."

However, even if the defendant receives a remittance from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to deliver the goods.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 500,00 from the victim’s credit account E in the name of A, and received a total of KRW 3,96,00 through eight times as shown in the attached Table of Crimes (I) as shown in the attached Table of Crimes (I).

[2013 High 1501] On January 17, 2013, the Defendant posted a notice to the effect that “a sales of 600D Kameras” on the Internet “C” page in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, would send the Kameras to the victim F who reported and contacted the notice if he remitted KRW 490,000 to the victim F.

‘Falsely speaking to the effect that ‘’ was false.

However, even if the defendant receives the payment from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to provide the victim with the camera.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received 490,000 won from the victim as the price for the goods under the name of the Defendant.

[2013 High Court Decision 201502] On 24, 2013, the Defendant sent money to the victim G by reporting and communicating that the Defendant sold PETV on the Internet NAC page. On 2013, the Defendant sent the money to the victim G, who sent the goods.

However, even if the defendant receives the price, he did not have the intention or ability to send the thing.

Accordingly, the victim acquired 2,490,000 won from the victim to the national bank account in the name of the defendant, such as the transfer of 710,000 won from the victim to the national bank account in the name of the defendant.

Summary of Evidence

(b).

arrow