beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Detailed Category C 1: Detailed E 3: A detailed research institute in charge of the Plaintiff (the representative director at the time of the Plaintiff): Plaintiff 2 in charge of the Plaintiff in charge of the Plaintiff in charge of the Plaintiff in charge of the instant research institute: 1 specific research institute in charge of the Plaintiff in charge of the instant research institute: G 2: H 3 specific research institute in charge of the CPPP S: B: From July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2015 (the development period on July 13, 2015 was extended to September 30, 2015);
A. On July 1, 2012, the Plaintiff, etc. (the trade name before being changed to March 31, 2017 is “B”) entered into an agreement on the development of the sports industry (hereinafter “instant agreement”) with the Seoul Olympic Sports Promotion Foundation (hereinafter “Corporation”) on which the Plaintiff, etc. were to perform the following tasks with government subsidies, etc. as financial resources, and concluded the agreement on the development of the sports industry (hereinafter “instant project”).
B. The Plaintiff, as a general managing research institute and a specific managing research institute, was paid a total of KRW 1.53 billion in the course of performing the pertinent task for three years and three months from July 1, 2012 to September 30, 2015, with G as a managing research institute and a managing research institute, who was the representative director, as a managing research institute and G.
C. Article 7(1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) was prosecuted (Seoul Central District Court 2015Dahap11130) on May 19, 2016, G was convicted (two years of imprisonment and three years of suspended execution) by the above court, and the above judgment (hereinafter “instant criminal judgment”) was finalized on May 27, 2016 as it became final and conclusive on May 27, 2016 due to G’s failure to appeal by G.
Accordingly, the defendant uses 923,232,733 won exceeding 30% of the total research and development costs (State subsidies) 1.53 billion won for non-use.