Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000,000,000,000,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 21, 2016, Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of damage to public goods at the Suwon Friwon, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive around December 23, 2016.

A. The Defendant who damaged property is between the victim C and the victim.

around November 18, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 08:30 on November 18, 2015, deemed that he/she had a stick for delivery to the victim around Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, and may be used as a lethal weapon.

하면서 그 지팡이를 빼앗은 후 인근에 설치된 나무 팻말에 내리쳐 지팡이가 휘어지게 하여 효용을 해하였다.

As a result, the defendant damaged a stick for industrial use in the market value, which is owned by the victim.

B. The Defendant 1-A, at the time, at the time, at the place specified in the claim 1-A, assaulted the victim B (37 tax) to check the victim B (the victim B) to put the stick into a slick, and assaulted the victim by taking the victim's side slick.

2. Defendant B and E’s co-crimes and E are as follows: around November 18, 2015, around 08:30, the Defendant and E do not slick the victim A (42 taxes) before Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D.

However, when the victim was assaulted by the victim, the defendant B sent the face of the victim by making a number of times, and damaged the victim's face, and E took the face of the victim by drinking.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

[Defendant A]

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement protocol against C, and suspect interrogation protocol against B;

1. On-site mobilization reports;

1. Photographss, ctv pictures and videos of the scene of occurrence of the stick;

1. Previous convictions in the holding: The search and text of thenet case [the Suwon District Court 2016 No. 5122] / [Defendant B]

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect;

1. On-site mobilization reports;

1. Application of A standing photographs, ctv video photographic Acts and subordinate statutes at the site of occurrence;

1. Relevant legal provisions and Defendant A who has the choice of punishment against the crime: Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence) and Article 260(2) of the Criminal Act, and Article 2 of the choice of fine: the Gu.