logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2013.10.24 2013고단1
사기
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for four months.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants were aware of the operation of the mileage of Defendant A’s Fenz’s car registered in Defendant B’s name, and had the said benz car sold at a lower price than the market price to acquire money from E.

Accordingly, Defendant A around August 24, 201, at the H’s restaurant operated by Defendant A located in the Daegu Suwon-gu G, “E selling the odometer 2006 Sz 500,000 F car registered in the name of B for KRW 50,00,000,” and Defendant B, at the same place around that time, provided E with necessary documents for the relocation of the said bsz car to E in the name of its owner.

However, on June 2010, the Defendants changed the odometer from 241,956km to 78,000km, and approximately 240,000 km from 240,000 km to 30,000,000 won.

Defendant

A, upon the E’s request, received KRW 20 million from E to the national bank account in the name of Defendant B, under the name of Defendant B, as the purchase price for the said benz car and the vehicle name, around August 24, 201, and received KRW 30 million in total from 10 million under the same name on the same day.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to deception E, thereby receiving a total of KRW 50 million from the victim, thereby deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ partial statement

1. I and E respective legal statements;

1. The first prosecutorial examination protocol against the Defendants (including questioning and testimony E);

1. Second-time protocol of interrogation of suspects to E;

1. Second prosecutorial examination protocol against Defendant A;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Statements and records of E in the second police interrogation protocol against the Defendants and E;

1. 71st day of the investigation records among the police statements of J against I and J, provided that the police statements of J are 71st day.

arrow