logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.08.12 2016고단846
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 17, 2014, the Defendant, at around 19:00 on February 17, 2014, purchased an accident vehicle, etc. and reselled it for a business to which he/she leased KRW 40,00 to B, “D” restaurant located in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.”

In addition, I will offer a passenger car as security under white benz S500, which has been on the domestic market.

‘Falsely speaks as ‘A certificate of the said car’ was shown.

However, in fact, the car that the defendant offered as security was offered as a separate debt to F, and the defendant was willing to lend money from the damaged person to G as a personal debt repayment, and thus, even if he borrowed money from the damaged person, there was no intention to use money under the above business name or offer it as a security.

On February 24, 2014, the Defendant was transferred to a national bank account in the name of the Defendant under the name of the Defendant after deducting interest in advance from the victim.

2. On March 1, 2014, the Defendant, at the “I” coffee shop located in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H on March 1, 2014, would pay the victim E interest on KRW 50,000 if he/she additionally lends KRW 50,000 to B, and use it for the resale of the vehicle after purchasing the accident vehicle.

In addition, it is expected to offer a passenger car as security by knish benz S500.

‘Falsely speaking, ‘benz motor vehicles parked in the J located in Gwangju City on the same day, present this vehicle as security.

After a false statement, “a motor vehicle registration certificate and a certificate of seal impression for the said motor vehicle have been issued to the victim at that time.”

However, in fact, since a passenger car offered as security by the defendant was planned to sell it in another place and there was no such authority, the defendant's intent to offer the car as security even if he/she borrows money from the injured party.

arrow