logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.09.22 2016고정103
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 13, 2014, the Defendant and B, at the Internet page, made a loan advertisement via the Internet page, prepared at will an application form for a mobile phone opening, and prepared to sell smartphones issued by a telecommunications company’s agent and have the intent to divide profits therefrom. On August 13, 2014, the Defendant received a photograph file of D’s resident registration certificate from D who wish to borrow a small amount of loans, and B was in advance holding a see pen.

In the customer name column of the application for Soleh Moble, two copies of the written application for D', "E", "E", "F", "B in the address column," "National Bank H in the bank account number column," "B in the applicant column," and "D" were written in the applicant column, and two copies of the written application for Soleh Moble Moble in the name of the above agency in the south-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City on the same day, and the defendant sent the file of D's resident registration certificate to K, and the defendant sent the file of D's resident registration certificate to K.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with B, forged two copies of a written application for Soleh Mobio boom in the name of a private document concerning rights, obligations, and proof of facts, and exercised this.

2. In collusion with the Defendant and B on August 13, 2014, the Defendant and B submitted two copies of the above J agency, and B submitted two copies of the written application for loleh Mobbbble joining the forged D’s resident registration certificate, and the Defendant, by deceiving K by means of sending the file of D’s resident registration certificate via e-mail, obtained two smartphones worth KRW 1.8 million in total from the victim case.

3. The Defendant’s fraud against the victim D is as above at the point of not more than the Southern-si (Seoul) around August 13, 2014.

arrow