Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On March 22, 2015, the Defendant assaulted C on March 03:50, and was arrested at around 04:10 on the same day as the current offender and arrived at D's seat. On the same day, even if the D's resident registration number was not unlawfully used by another person in D's seat area located in Y in Y, 04:17 on the same day, the Defendant knew about the issue of D's personal information F, and used H's resident registration number as G's resident registration number in the name of D's resident registration number in the name of the main store.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. Investigation report (Listening to the statement by telephone) (see, e.g., the defendant and his defense counsel requested the police officers to present a business report certificate at the time of arrest, and thus, the district court also held the identity of the person under the name of the business registration certificate and stated the name and date of birth of the interest-friendly G with the nominal owner of the business registration certificate, and thus does not constitute a violation

However, the police officer C, who was in charge of the case at the time, asked the name and resident registration number of the defendant in this court, and talks about the whole name and resident registration number of the defendant. The defendant confirmed that the name and the date of birth of the defendant presented by the defendant, using the name and the date of birth of the defendant, as the back of the resident registration number, was searched and searched.

The defendant presented his/her identification card at the end of his/her request several times, because his/her face is different from the face of the inquireer and the defendant's face, so that the defendant will not speak and accurately inform the defendant.

A consistent testimony, and a case that is the cause of the defendant's arrest at the time is an assault case, and therefore, it seems that there is no reason to confirm the nominal owner of the main store in the course of dealing with the case.