logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2020.09.21 2020고단1862
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Bchip car.

1. On April 29, 2020, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury) and the Road Traffic Act (unclaimed Measures after Accidents) (hereinafter “Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes Act”) driving a franchising car on April 29, 2020, and led the side road near Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to the E-O

In such cases, the driver has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the brakes and steering gear while driving the driver with a duty of care.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected the above duty of care and failed to care in the surrounding area, thereby making it possible for the Defendant to take the part of the left side of the Genz E200 car driven by the victim F (F, South and 20 years old) who stops at the right side of the running direction of the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, caused the victim to suffer injury, such as salt, tension, etc. in the part where the detailed elbow values in need of medical treatment for approximately two weeks, and at the same time, escaped without any measures such as stopping the said blue car and providing relief to the victim, even though it damages the said blue car to an extent equivalent to KRW 1,412,510 in total repairing costs.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (AFS) committed an accident while driving the said franchise vehicle, as described in Paragraph 1, while escapeing, the Defendant left the vehicle without stopping the vehicle and without taking necessary measures, even though, at the first time, Paragraph 1, the victim I, who was parked in the vicinity of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H on the side part of the said vehicle at the front part of the said vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1.F.

arrow