logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.09.07 2016고단4699
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and the Road Traffic Act (non-accidentd measures) are those engaged in driving motor vehicles of the franchiseer;

On March 7, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car on March 19:15, 2016, while driving the street in front of the E Hospital located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D in order to drive the three-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes in the direction of the day tunnel distance in the direction of the LUIC.

At the time, the Defendant, prior to the same direction, was followed by the Genz car driven by the Victim F (34 years old). In such a case, the Defendant had a duty of care to take care of the front left, and to prevent the accident by operating the steering system properly.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to operate the steering direction and operation system, and received the back part of the passenger vehicle on the right-hand side of the passenger vehicle operated by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, sustained injury to the above victim and the victim H (V, 31) who was on the top of the above benz car operation, who was on board the above benz, and had no room for medical treatment for about three weeks, and at the same time escaped without taking necessary measures, such as aiding and abetting the above benz car by stopping the above 6,104,010 won, such as exchanging the right side part of the benz with the back part of the above benz.

2. While the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol by approximately 0.28% in blood alcohol concentration at a temporary border under paragraph (1) of this Article, the Defendant driven a clater vehicle at a distance of about 10km from the front day of a mutually influent restaurant in the Ma-dong, Seongdong-gu, Sungnam-gu, Seoul to the front day of the E Hospital located in Gangnam-gu, Seoul.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1.F.

arrow