logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.02.07 2014고정316
도로교통법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a person driving BKank-Pon vehicle. Around 14:55 on September 10, 2013, the Defendant driven the vehicle at a small-scale monthly distance of 1234, Dong-dong, Nam-gu, Incheon, and made a right-hand turn to the long-speed distance of 20km from the surface of the sand market to the long-speed of 20km. Since at the time, at the time the sand market, there was a pedestrian signal toward the long-distance distance, a driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle by driving the vehicle at the expense of the victim (the victim 49 years old) who damaged the right-hand side of the vehicle at the expense of the victim (the victim 49 years old) who got to the right-hand side of the vehicle at the expense of 30-lane Kank-gu, 100 Kak-gu, 200 Kakk-gu.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. According to the records, it is recognized that the victim withdraws his/her intent to punish the defendant after the institution of the instant prosecution. Thus, the instant prosecution is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparag. 6

arrow