logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2014.06.11 2014고정274
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives a B E-car.

On December 8, 2013, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on the 15:25th day of December, 2013, and continued directly from the direction of the sand internal market by using the Anlley-distance intersection in the eropo-gu Seoul metropolitan area.

In such cases, since a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle is a place where traffic is controlled by signal apparatus, he/she has a duty of care to drive a motor vehicle according to the new code.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and did not discover the driver DD (ma, 51) of the injured vehicle Crenched vehicle in the middle of green straight line from the right side of the proceeding to the left side of the stop line, and did not turn back to the front side of the damaged vehicle and the front front side of the affected vehicle, and followed by the first progress direction after receiving it from the front side of the damaged vehicle and the front front side of the affected vehicle, and shocked on the left side of the sand market from the right side of the damaged vehicle E-picked vehicle in the traffic signal at the right side of the left side.

As a result, the victim D suffered from the "catus catus catus" which requires approximately two weeks of treatment, and the victim suffered from the F (n, 67 years of age) of the victim's catus F (n, f7 years of age) which requires approximately 10 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the actual condition investigation report on traffic accidents, on-site photographs statutes;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow