A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who sells any click game machine (one name: extracted machine) in the warehouse of “J” located in Gyeongnam-do, Yangyang-do.

피고인은 2015. 11. 18. 위 ‘J’ 창고에서 불상의 중간 공급업 자로부터 상표권 자인 프랑스 ‘루 이비 똥 말 레 띠에’ 사, ‘ 샤넬’ 사, 이탈리아 ‘ 구치 오구치 쏘시에 떼 퍼 아 찌 오니’ 사, 대한민국 ‘ 삼성전자 주식회사’, ‘ 엘지 전자 주식회사’ 가 각각 대한민국 특허청에 그 지정 상품을 지갑, 라이터, 태블릿 컴퓨터, 휴대폰용 이어 폰 등으로 정하여 등록한 ‘루 이비 똥 (LOUIS VUITTON)', ' 샤넬 (CHANEL)', ‘ 구치 (GUCCI)’, ‘ 삼성’, ’LG‘ 와 동일 ㆍ 유사한 상표가 부착된 지갑, 라이터, 태블릿 컴퓨터, 휴대폰용 이어 폰 등을 공급 받아 판매하고 별지 범죄 일람표 기재와 같이 나머지 810점( 정품 시가 약 5억 3,240만원) 을 판매 목적으로 보관하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant infringed the trademark rights of the above trademark right holders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a seizure report and investigation report (6 to 18 times a net time);

1. Article 93 of the Trademark Act concerning facts constituting an offense (including each registered trademark);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 97-2(1) of the Trademark Act and Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act is the size of the crime, motive of the crime, motive of the crime, and the confession of the crime, and the fact that by selling counterfeit goods as free gifts from a machine extracted from a single name, consumers misleads them as authentic goods or have a particular impact on the demand for authentic goods sold by the trademark right holder.

Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the fact that it cannot be seen, the fact that there was no record of being punished as a violation of the Trademark Act, the fact that it was detained from November 19, 2015, and other family support relations.