Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 14:05 on October 23, 2020, the Defendant driven a FST5 car under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.239% in the direction of approximately 3 kilometers from the Defendant’s house located in B at the same time at the same time via the City C market at the same time, to the front distance intersection of the “E” located in D at the same time at the same time.

2. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a FM5 vehicle in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Risk Driving).

Around 14:05 on October 23, 2020, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol as described in paragraph (1) above, and was in the vicinity of “E” located in “E” in “E” at the time of Lhyeong-si, and was directly promoted from G hospital’s room to the front door of the Donghyeong-gu.

At the time, the above private distance intersection was prohibited from the door-to-door view door-to-door view in the G hospital, and in such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving safely according to the road traffic signal or instruction to a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to drive normally due to negligence while under the influence of alcohol, and received the part of the Defendant’s front side of the Defendant’s car in front of the instant car, which was directly driven by the victim H (Y, 46 years old), who was in line with the proceeding signals from the offline of the madles to the crosssection.

Ultimately, the Defendant by such negligence inflicted injury on the victim H, such as light salt in need of approximately two weeks’ medical treatment, and suffered injury on the victim J (the remaining and the aged 50) who was on board the victim H’s scambling scam for about two weeks’ medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the police made by the defendant to H in the court;

1. A traffic accident;