logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 상주지원 2013.11.19 2013고단357
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 20:05 on July 24, 2013, the Defendant was driving a Cran TG car under the influence of alcohol level of approximately 0.153% in the section of about 2km from the front side of the Gu restaurant located in the Gu 115 in the Chang-gu, Chang-gu, Chang-gu, Chang-gu, Chang-dong to the point of about 79-1 in the Gu dong-dong 79-1.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.A.) provided that the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol as above, driven the said vehicle while driving the said vehicle at a temporary crossing and proceeded to a yellow restaurant on the surface of the bus terminal. Since it is an intersection where traffic control is not performed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to check whether there is a vehicle crossing by reducing speed or temporarily stopping and safely drive the vehicle and prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to enter the intersection as it is, and instead, was driven by the victim D (the 61-year old) who is driving a one-lane of the distance distance prior to the point of the road as a big apartment door from the flive distance off the flive distance. The lower part of the right side part of the E-TG car driven by the Defendant was the front part of the said car operated by the Defendant.

The Defendant, by occupational negligence, suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and at the same time, the Prosecutor of the 1,527,346 Won, which is owned by F, calculated only the repair hole as indicated in the 57 pages of the investigation records. The 54 pages of the investigation records are excluded from the repair cost, and the repair components of the 54 pages of the investigation records are excluded from the repair cost, and the court does not decide on the part exceeding the facts charged separately from criminal facts.

Even if considerable damage is inflicted to the extent, the victims are stopped immediately and the victims are rescued.

arrow