A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a member of the E-Housing controlled entity established for the purpose of housing management business, building management business, etc. in Ansan-si D.

On October 25, 2016, at the Internet around October 25, 2016, the Defendant informed that the notice of the public announcement of the selection of housing management managers of F apartment housing was about 4 p.m. on the same day, and that the normal participation in the tender was difficult, the Defendant conspired to participate in the tender by forging relevant documents by changing the date of the tender-related documents.

around October 25, 2016, the Defendant changed the part of “as of October 2016” from among the documents “written reply to verify the fact of administrative disposition on housing management business” under the name of the safe market without authority for the purpose of exercising at the office E office of the said stock company, to “as of October 2016,” and “as of October 17, 2016,” and “as of October 11, 2016,” the date at which the document was executed at the bottom of the document,” respectively. On February 24, 2016, the Defendant changed the part of “multi-family housing management record certificate” under the name of the safe market to “as of October 11, 2016,” and “as of February 24, 2016,” the lower court changed the lower part of “multi-family housing management record certificate” under the name of the relevant administrative disposition, and “as of February 16, 2016,” and changed the same part to the “multi housing management record certificate.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on each original official document and forged documents;

1. Article 225 of the Criminal Act (the point of Article 25 of the Official Document) and Articles 229 and 225 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (the point of uttering of forged official document);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the community service order (within the range of recommended sentencing guidelines) is 1.