A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 3, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution on April, 2018 by obstructing business operations at the Suwon Friwon, and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 24, 2018.

1. On June 5, 2017, the Defendant forged a public document, in the office of “E” operated by the Defendant, who is on the Seocho-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, which had been issued by the Suwon-si Police Station, can can the “Notice of the Results of Inquiry into the Administrative Disposition for the Security Business E,” issued by the said office by the said office, and then changed the “Notice on January 5, 2017” to “FO on June 5, 2017” by using a computer.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the defendant forged one copy of the notice of confirmation of administrative disposition under the name of the head of the police station south of the Republic of Korea, which is an official document.

2. The Defendant’s uttering of forged official document submitted the notice as if it were issued genuinely as a result of checking the administrative disposition, which is a forged official document, at the management office of Suwon-si’s 40-ro 177, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, which is equivalent to the number of 177, to the above paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A copy of the original of an official document before alteration, and a copy of the altered official document;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Inquiry about criminal history, reporting on investigation, and application of statutes attached to the judgment;

1. Article 225 of the Criminal Act (the point of Article 25 of the Official Document) and Articles 229 and 225 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (the point of uttering of forged official document);

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Based on the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, the sentencing conditions specified in the instant trial process, such as Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, family relationship, family environment, motive and means of crime, and circumstances after crime, shall be determined as ordered.