The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant of this case’s charges

A. On July 4, 2019, around 19:00, at the 3rd floor of the Changwon City B building, there are several members, such as D’s members E and F, in the cafeteria of D’s 3rd floor of the C, Changwon-si. In fact, although the victim G did not receive money from the construction company, the victim’s “the victim was specially and specially informed. According to the horses of H-related persons, I will take money from H and I, and received money from H”, the victim’s reputation was damaged by openly pointing out false facts;

(b) The same year;

9. At around 19:00, at the first floor of the J Building, the victim’s reputation was damaged by openly pointing out false facts by stating that “seven persons, including G, who received KRW 7 billion from H of a stock company, were divided by one billion.”

C. On December 27, 27, 18:30 of the same year, at the “L” restaurant of the first floor of B building, the victim injured the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts, stating that “seven persons, including G, received KRW 7 billion from H to KRW 7 billion from the corporation H, and received KRW 1 billion for each one billion.”

2. The offense charged with the judgment is an offense falling under Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act and is not charged against a person who violates this provision against the clearly expressed will of the victim pursuant to Article 312(2) of the Criminal Act.

On May 13, 2020, the written agreement for the preparation of the victim was submitted to this court to the effect that the defendant does not want to be punished.

Therefore, the prosecution against the above defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.