The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Facts charged;

A. On December 10, 2012, the Defendant embezzled the Defendant’s victim D (48 tax, n.e., 48) who is the secretary general at the partnership’s office located in Go Interest-gun C around 08:10 on December 10, 2012.

In doubt, ‘the money' is inscribed in the presence of staff E and the victim.

The voice of "in the Do Do Ba's office," etc. damaged the honor of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

B. On January 10, 2013, the victim’s reputation was damaged by publicly pointing out false facts, such as “I sales ledger became nonexistent, and the Do bank year was brought about,” in the hearing of the victim, office staff E, F, and G, who did not work at the above location.”

(c)

2013. 1. 10. 오후 경, 위 장소에서 사무실 직원 E, F, G이 듣는 가운데, 당시 피해자가 거주하던 집을 팔고 시댁 2 층에 주택을 건축하여 이사한 사실을 두고, “ 그 집도 돈을 횡령하여 지었다” 고 말하는 등 공연히 허위사실을 적시하여 피해자의 명예를 훼손하였다.

(d)

On February 25, 2013, when hearing from office G, E, and H at the above location, the victim’s reputation was damaged by openly pointing out false facts, such as “D, at the place of origin,” which read “D, at the place of origin.”

E. On April 17, 2013, 10:00, at the I Association Publicity Center located in Gojin-gun, Goung-gun, Nam-gun around 10:10, more than 100 persons, including members J, etc., were the problem of embezzlement, etc. of public funds, and D did not know of the passbook.

D has damaged the honor of the victim by openly pointing out false facts, such as the phrase “a person who brought corporate seals to the articles of association,” etc.

2. Dismissal of public prosecution;

(a) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 312 (2) of the Criminal Act;

B. On December 30, 2015, after the prosecution of this case, a letter of agreement was submitted that the injured party expressed his/her intent not to have the Defendant punished.

(c)

Judgment dismissing Public Prosecution: Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act