Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

【2013 fixed352】

1. On August 9, 2012, the Defendant: (a) opened a mobile phone in the name of E using a copy of the d'D' mobile phone sales store located in Seo-gu, Daegu; (b) opened a mobile phone in the name of E using a copy of the d's resident registration certificate that had been used before making a credit card from E; and (c) opened a mobile phone in the name of E despite the consent of E without obtaining the consent of E; and (d) made the D's owner F enter the name, resident registration number, etc. in each corresponding column of the new contract for mobile phone service, and sign it following the name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a new contract for mobile phone service in the name of victim E, a private document related to rights and duties.

2. The Defendant exercised a falsified mobile phone service contract at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) by allowing the use of the falsified mobile phone service contract by F as if it were genuine.

[Judgment of the court below]

3. On September 18, 2012, the Defendant: (a) subscribed to the mobile phone “I” number and “J” number from H located in Seo-gu Daegu-gu G; (b) stated “K” and “L” in each name column of Chapter II of the written application for subscription of LG U mobile phone without the consent of the victim K; and (c) stated “L” in each resident registration number column without obtaining the consent of the victim K.

Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of exercising rights and duties, forged two copies of the application form for mobile phone opening in the name of the victim K, which is a private document.

4. At the time and place specified in paragraph (3), the Defendant: (a) delivered two copies of the forged mobile phone application form to N, an employee of M, who is aware of the forgery as if they were duly formed; and (b) exercised the same.

5. The Defendant, while submitting two copies of an application for the admission of a forged mobile phone at the time and place specified in paragraph 3, by deceiving the victim N by driving as if he/she obtained K’s consent.

The defendant.