logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2015.08.11 2015고단346
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for six months, each of the defendants B.

However, as to Defendant B, this shall not apply.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2015 Highest 346"

1. Defendant A

A. On June 30, 2014, the Defendant: (a) forged private documents related to the mobile phone in the name of D; (b) forged private documents; (c) forged private documents; and (d) forged private documents; and (c) submitted an application form for registration of a corporation in the name of D, which is a private document related to rights and duties, to an employee of the corporation using DNA personal information with which the Defendant had subscribed to the mobile phone via the Defendant, with intent to arbitrarily subscribe to the mobile phone; and (d) opened the mobile phone by purchasing only 4 U.S. cell phone form in Chapter 2 of the application form for registration of Samsung G, Inc., which is kept at the same time, with intent to exercise his/her personal information such as D’s name; and (d) forged the total application form for registration of a mobile phone in the name of D, which is a private document related to rights and duties; and (e) submitted the application form to the employees of the corporation through the above sales store and exercised the same.

On July 1, 2014, the Defendant continued to forge a new service contract and a new service contract for the KScom Co., Ltd. in the form of a new service contract and a sales contract for the terminal license, using D’s personal information, and using D’s personal information in the same manner, and “applicant customer” column with the intent to exercise D’s personal information, including D’s name and other information, and each copy of the new service contract and the sales contract for the terminal license, which is a private document related to rights and duties, are forged. At the same time, the Defendant submitted the forged contract to an employee in charge who is unable to know the name of the KScom Co., Ltd. through the above sales store and exercised it, respectively.

(2) The Defendant’s fraud is the date, time, place, and place under the foregoing paragraph (1).

arrow