A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

On September 23, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of two million won due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Northern District Court on September 23, 2015, and was sentenced to a fine of five million won due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the same court on February 8, 2017, and was sentenced to a fine of six million won due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act. On August 10, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny in the same court on August 10, 2017,

1. On September 1, 2017, the Defendant was under the influence of a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) and a violation of the Road Traffic Act (DW528i driver’s license) on around 00:5, the Defendant driven a vehicle without the driver’s license in the section of approximately 200 meters from the place where the Seongbuk-gu Ga-dong is located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu to the front road of Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, without the driver’s license.

2. Around 01:19 on September 201, 2017, the Defendant: (a) took charge of driving under drinking on the front of Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government road; (b) was subject to a request for electronic signature for the preparation of an inquiry report on the result of crackdown on driving under influence of alcohol from the traffic of the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Seongbuk Police Station and the head of the police station affiliated with the E system; (c) had F enter the personal information, details, etc. of “G” in the column for entry of the information on driving under the influence of alcohol into the PDA (port portable session); and (d) had the person for confirmation at the same place enter the personal information, details, etc. of “G” in the column for entry of the information on driving under the influence of alcohol; and (d) forged the G’s private signature without authority for the purpose of exercising the signature as if the signature was the signature of “G” in the column for confirmation at that place; and (e) exercised

3. On September 1, 2017, the Defendant: (a) at the place indicated in the foregoing paragraph “2” around 01:29, the Defendant: (b) requested the said F to sign the “report on the State driver’s circumstantial statement”; (c)” column of “G driver’s opinion statement”; and (d) forged the “report on the State driver’s circumstantial statement” under the name of G, a private document concerning the rights and duties and proof of facts without authority for the purpose of utteringing the signature.