logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2009. 08. 20. 선고 2009두7387 판결
주택판매업자의 분양수입금액을 누락한 것으로 본 처분의 당부[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Gwangju High Court 2008Nu2421 ( October 17, 2009)

Title

propriety of the disposition on omission of the sales revenue amount by a housing sales agent

Summary

In the event that a house is sold at a price less than the construction cost of the house, or that a house is sold at a price less than the amount of a bond secured on a house and the amount of a bond refunded is in violation of the empirical rule, the disposition determined and imposed on the basis of the meta of a person in charge of sale is legitimate.

The decision

The contents of the decision shall be the same as attached.

Text

The appeal shall be dismissed.

Costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

Reasons

The records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal on the grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds stipulated in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition with

arrow