logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2016.02.05 2015고합22
업무상횡령
Text

Defendant

A and B shall be punished by imprisonment for two years, by imprisonment for eight months, and by imprisonment for one year and six months, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A on August 29, 2014, with sentence of six months of imprisonment or one year of suspended execution at the Ulsan District Court for the acquisition of stolen goods, etc., and the said sentence is the same year.

9.6. Finality was established.

Defendant

A is a person who was employed by around September 2005 in I (hereinafter referred to as “I”) and was engaged in the business of shipping Magine Co., Ltd., which is materials for the production of the automobile power plant, and recovering the prices thereof from around March 2014. Defendant C is a person in charge of the management of the first production plant of the victim J. (hereinafter referred to as “victim”). Defendant B is a person in charge of the management of the second production plant of the victim company, and Defendant D is a second production business entity.

Defendant

A and C around 2006, upon receipt of the victim company's Magyco (hereinafter referred to as "co-days") from I, and using the practice of receiving more quantity than the actual amount necessary for the production at all times, Defendant C entered part of the co-days purchased by the victim company into the above 1 production factory and entered the whole co-days into the above 1 production factory, and Defendant A was in custody of the victim company without supplying part of the co-days to the victim company, and conspired to divide the price into part after disposing of it to the scraper.

Since then, around 2007, Defendant A conspiredd to divide profits after disposing of the surplus surplus to be entered into the second production factory of the victim company in the above manner as above to Defendant B in the second production factory of the victim company.

1. Defendant A and C’s joint criminal defendants are not in the market price at the I’s racing business place located in K on February 17, 2006, that I should supply to the first production factory of the victim company according to the sales contract with the victim company, and at the same time, Defendant D, who is a senior goods business operator, has been kept in custody for the victim company.

arrow