logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.14 2015고단4933
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing taxi.

On June 6, 2015, the Defendant driven the above taxi at around 15:20, and driven the five-lane road in front of C in light of light, along the two-lanes from the boundary of the iron mountain mountain, the two-lanes.

Since the location is an intersection where signal lights are installed, in such cases, the person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to check whether a vehicle passes the intersection by reducing the speed of the person engaged in driving service and by properly examining the front side and the left side, and to safely drive the vehicle in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to enter the intersection as it was, and followed by the negligence of entering the intersection while the electric signal was changed to a yellow signal, and received the front right part of the EMAXYM400EAB-wheeled vehicle operated by the victim D (the age of 46) who was an intern in accordance with his normal signal on the opposite lane, as the front part of the Defendant driving vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence for about eight weeks after the left-hand side of the need for medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. On-site and vehicle photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Selection of a selective fine (the fact that the defendant does not want the punishment of the defendant by mutual consent with the victim shall be considered);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow