Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Grandroth.

On February 24, 2020, the Defendant driven the above van on February 14:25, 2020, and driven the 213-lane in front of the Mapo-gu Office, Mapo-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government World Cup, along the three-lanes from Mapo-gu to the World Cup stadium.

Since the location is an intersection with signal apparatus installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive according to the signal or instruction displayed by traffic safety facilities by reducing speed and checking well the right and the right before entering the intersection.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to change the crosssection signal to a yellow signal, but neglected to reach the intersection, and caused by negligence of entering the intersection as is in contravention of the signal and shocking the left side of the D Village bus operated by the victim C(48 years old) to the left side of the said van.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, caused the victim C to suffer bodily injury, such as fluoral salt in need of treatment for about two weeks, and the victim E (the 21-year old age), who was on board the damaged vehicle, to suffer bodily injury, such as fluoral salt, tension, etc. in need of treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of each investigation report (to be replaced by a black image) by investigation report (to be replaced by a traffic information czech image and a cause of an accident) by a defendant's partial statement in court, a fact-finding report, and an investigation report;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.