logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2013.07.25 2013고단2108
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle B, and the Defendant driven the above-mentioned motor vehicle around 14:00 on April 24, 2013 and proceeded at a speed of about 30-40 kilometers in speed from the east-distance to the intersection of the intersection in the Dong-dong of Daejeon-gu, Daejeon, by using one lane on the speed of about 30-40 kilometers in speed.

At the same time, a car for the business use of the victim C(56 years old) was parked in the signal signal atmosphere. In such a case, the driver of the vehicle was negligent in performing the duty of care to care in advance, while maintaining the right and the left and right of the vehicle, and safely proceeding with the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in question, and the vehicle in need of two weeks in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front.

2. The facts charged of the instant case are crimes falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent pursuant to the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the same Act. The records show that the said victims were prosecuted against the Defendant after the institution of the instant indictment

arrow