beta
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Daejeon District Court 2015Na103591 ( October 20, 2015)
Title
The instant disposition does not have a correlation with a public official’s breach of duty of direct injury.
Summary
The damage claimed by the Plaintiff is not a disposition due to occupational negligence not caused by a public official’s failure to inform another person of his/her business registration and to recommend the closure of business, but a disposition imposed on the Plaintiff because the Plaintiff did not pay the tax to him/her while continuing to operate the gas station under his/her own name. Therefore, it is difficult to view that there
Related statutes
Article 5 of the former Value-Added Tax Act
Cases
Supreme Court Decision 2015Da247936
Plaintiff and appellant
BB
Defendant, Appellant
CCC
Judgment of the first instance court
National Rotations
Imposition of Judgment
February 12, 2016
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.
Reasons
As the petition of appeal filed by the Plaintiff did not state the grounds of appeal and did not submit the appellate brief within the statutory period, it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices, pursuant to Article 429 of the Civil Procedure Act and Article 5 of the Act on Special Cases concerning