logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2015. 12. 11. 선고 2015두55806 판결
원고들에게 명의신탁 당시 조세회피 목적이 있었는지 여부[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2015-Nu-43058

Title

Whether there was an objective of tax avoidance at the time of title trust to the Plaintiffs

Summary

The evidence submitted by the plaintiffs alone that it is difficult to view that there is no purpose of tax avoidance, and in the case of shares that require the opening of name, the value of the shares calculated by the date the transfer of name is actually made shall be deemed the

Related statutes

Article 45-2 of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act

Cases

2015Du55806

Plaintiff-Appellant

***

Defendant-Appellee

Head of Gangnam District Office outside 2

Judgment of the lower court

National Rotations

Imposition of Judgment

December 11, 2015

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

The petition of appeal filed by the plaintiffs does not state the grounds of appeal, and the appellate brief is filed within the statutory period.

Since the plaintiff did not submit a statement of the grounds for appeal filed (the grounds for appeal filed by the plaintiff was received on December 10, 2015, which was after the expiration of the period), Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act, Article 429 of the Civil Procedure Act, and Article 5 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal by the assent of all participating

arrow