Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and two months, and for a defendant B, for eight months, respectively.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants, as a foreigner of the nationality of the People's Republic of China, were willing to steal cash from a room where passengers aboard the aircraft are placed in the offline.

On October 10, 2015, the Defendants jointly start the Incheon International Airport and start the aircraft at around 19:06, the air KS471 aircraft to the AE471 aircraft of the Union of Myanmar, on the part of the victim D of Japanese nationality on board the said aircraft, and the Defendants reported the network in the vicinity of the other Defendant B, and the Defendant A returned to the place where the victim was kept in the off and returned to the place, 1020,000 UN (the Japanese currency, the Korean currency, approximately KRW 978,00) was owned by the victim.

As a result, the Defendants committed a theft of another's property jointly.

2. On June 5, 2015, at around 04:05, the Defendant started the Adonesia Gara Airport and went to the Incheon International Airport, Defendant A failed to commit an attempted crime, even if the victim on board the aircraft, who was in custody of the victim E, was deprived of the crepit in the front part of the area where the victim, who was in board the aircraft, was seated in the front part of the area where the victim got off, and went back with the object to be stolen.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Each legal statement of witness F and E;

1. Statement made by the prosecution against the F;

1. Each police statement made to D or G;

1. Investigation report (including photographs, such as a stolen envelope, etc.);

1. The record of seizure, the list of seizure, the photograph of seized articles, and the cash photograph of the suspect B A [the defendant B denies the instant crime, and the defendant A, while denying the instant crime, stated to the effect that the Defendant A, while recognizing the instant crime at the third trial date, was detained.

However, the amount of loss of the victim D and the amount found in the part of the defendant A are accurately identical to the amount found in the part of the defendant A, and the defendant A is about the source of the DNA found in the part of the defendant A in Myanmar.