logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.04.07 2016고단620
출입국관리법위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, this decision is delivered to the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A and Defendant B are married persons of their nationality in the People's Republic of China.

If a foreigner intends to enter the Republic of Korea, he/she shall undergo an entry inspection at the immigration port of entry.

On December 2, 2015, the Defendants: (a) provided that the Defendants were allowed to enter the Republic of Korea by having the broman residing in China, and (b) provided a total of 120,000 won in return for receiving the residence, employment, etc. after entering the Republic of Korea.

On January 15, 2016, the Defendants conspired to enter and stay in the Republic of Korea after having arrived at the Nauri Airport of China from January 15, 2016 in accordance with the instructions of the said D, and were willing to enter the Republic of Korea in the capacity of exchange passengers after having arrived at the Incheon International Airport on January 20, 2016.

On January 20, 2016, the Defendants arrived at the Incheon International Airport by Air KS002 (Seoul East east), and followed by an entry inspection on January 21, 2016, which was conducted in the capacity of exchange passengers departing from China on January 21, 2016, but the Defendants were denied entry due to lack of the requirements of exchange passenger entry.

When the Defendants were unable to enter the Republic of Korea in a normal manner, they conspired to enter the country on January 21, 2016, and conspired to enter the country in collusion with the employees of the immigration control office on January 21, 2016, passing through the departure inspection counter and the security search zone on the 3th third floor of Incheon International Airport, using the gaps in which the employees of the immigration control office are bound and the surveillance is neglected, and forced to open the door door of the corrected international airport to the port of departure and to leave the port of departure.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Copy of the protocol concerning the examination of suspects of E;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. The statistics of entry inspection, the copy of the screen for the inquiry of entry RP review records, the arrangement of moving lines to the Incheon Airport in China, the departure screening course (1) (2) without permission in the region B, and the passenger entry place.

arrow