logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.11.23 2017고단7414
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

(A, 39 years of age, women) is a foreigner of Thailand nationality.

The defendant knew that when purchasing tax-free goods using a credit card on an airplane in flight, the defendant could purchase the goods using a forged credit card in the name of the defendant, with the knowledge that the goods may be purchased with a card without the credit card company's approval, because the transaction took place without the credit card company's approval, and the approval is requested.

Accordingly, on July 27, 2017, the defendant started from Thai-gu International Airport of Thai-gu, 04:13 on July 27, 2017, and suggested that the defendant was a credit card issued in the name of the defendant for the victims of Asia and Aeronautical Aircraft operating through Incheon International Airport, where it is impossible to know the name of selling the tax-free goods in the aircraft, as if the victim's crew of Asia and Aeronautical Aircraft purchased a mong, purchased a mong-type and completed a normal credit card

However, in fact, the above card was forged and thus not settled, so the defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the price even if he purchased the product from the injured party.

Nevertheless, the defendant, by deceiving the victim company as such, was issued by the victim company with a mong cryp of USD 385 at the market price at tin, and the same year from that time.

9. Until December 27, 200, the credit card used forged credit cards, including the receipt of property equivalent to USD 9,770 ($ 11,171,95 in the aggregate of the market values) over 15 times in total, as shown in the attached list of crimes.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired the property of the victim and used the forged credit card.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (the date of the second public trial shall be the date);

1. Each police statement made to E, F, and G;

1. Any response to the record on board aircraft of the subject person, list of defective A transactions, list of purchase of A products, sales slips prepared by the suspect on his/her own hand, forged card issuing number, and issuing agency;

arrow