logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.01.22 2014고단3745
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3 million.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 9, 2014, the Defendant reported on September 22 and 10, 2014, around the first floor of the Daejeon U.S. D Building, Defendant A reported on the 5th floor E of the said building, and reported the sloping G, the sloping Police Station Fast, who was called out after receiving a report, and reported on the 112 that he was frighting in the said 5th floor E of the said building, and Defendant C, “Isle, Isle, Isle, and Isle,” and continued to display a drinking, and “Isle, Isle, and four slewhs,” and the sle of the hump of the sle of the sleb.

Accordingly, the defect that the above slope G and the Ha arrested the Defendant in the act of obstructing the performance of official duties, and attempted to take the arrest of the Defendant in the act of obstructing the performance of official duties, and the Defendant put the head head of the above Ha in his hand, and assaulted the Defendant at one time at the price of the head of the slope G with the defect that the slope G attempted to take on the Defendant at the 112 patrols.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the police officer's 112 report processing duties and legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders.

2. At around September 22, 2014, the Defendant: (a) stated that G slope, the superintendent of the police station, was going to have his friendship A on board the 112 patrol vehicle in front of the same place as the above paragraph (1) on September 22, 2014; and (b) stated that “I am to have his friendship A carried on the 112 patrol vehicle; (c) I am to the slope, G, and the superintendent of the police station, “I am to write off, why she is????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of police officers in the act of committing a crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to H, G, and I;

1. Application of statutes to photographs of victimized police officers;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned (the point of obstruction of performance of official duties);

1. Defendant A of ordinary concurrence: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, respectively, of the provisional payment order.

arrow